🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations was effective, and revealed recent overtures had originated from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is walking a complex route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with the American leader claiming the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, Western states used their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Position

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations reopen.

The US president in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the assaults began with a US demand for an total Iran submission and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith hard to restore.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Solution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had always tried to impose their desires during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and continues the primary solution to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, regulations and principles must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, stays intact. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the aftermath of this attack."